India’s Horticulture Gains Mask Deep Structural Gaps That Keep Food Prices Volatile

The third advance estimates show the supply side is improving; the question now is whether policymakers will use this window to fix the market mechanics that have historically undone supply gains

The government’s Third Advance Estimates for 2024–25 present a mixed ledger: horticulture area is forecast to rise to 29.488 million hectares (from 29.086 million ha a year earlier) and total production to 369.055 million tonnes, up about 14.31 million tonnes from 2023–24. Fruits are expected at 118.76 million tonnes (up 5.12%), vegetables 215.684 million tonnes (up 4.09%), onions 30.789 million tonnes (up 26.9%), potatoes 58.108 million tonnes (up 1.85%), spices 12.503 million tonnes, and aromatic & medicinal plants 0.781 million tonnes.

Those headline gains are welcome — but they must not lull policymakers or markets into complacency. History shows that higher aggregate output alone does not buy price stability for Indian consumers. Without rapid fixes to chronic structural problems, bumper figures can coexist with sharp retail spikes and household pain. The estimates should therefore mark the start of an urgent, coordinated policy push — not the end of one.

Why the figures are not enough

  1. Post-harvest losses and cold chain gaps. A large share of fruits and vegetables never reaches consumers in usable form because of inadequate cold storage, packaging and transport. Until losses fall materially, additional tonnes will simply widen wastage rather than cut retail prices.
  2. Regional concentration and timing of arrivals. Production is spatially concentrated and seasonally bunched — a local shock or a compressed arrival window can create sudden scarcity in major consuming centres.
  3. Market frictions and information asymmetry. Fragmented markets, weak aggregation by farmers (small holdings), and opaque trade practices make it hard to translate farm-gate surpluses into stable retail supplies.
  4. Policy reflexes that amplify volatility. Ad-hoc export curbs, panic procurement and crude taxes have in past cycles magnified price swings instead of smoothing them.

What needs to be done — immediate, medium and structural steps

Below are targeted, practical measures keyed to the estimates and aimed at converting production gains into durable price stability and higher farmer incomes.

Immediate (0–6 months)

  • Real-time arrival monitoring and market signalling. Scale up daily arrival reporting for onions, tomatoes and potatoes across key mandis and publish centralised dashboards to help buyers, processors and state procurement agencies act early. Impact: reduces panic buying and enables timely interventions.
  • Targeted temporary storage subsidies. Offer short-term viability support (e.g., subsidised electricity, transport vouchers) to convert surplus onion and tomato arrivals into stored stocks rather than forced distress sales. Impact: prevents immediate price collapses at farm-gate and moderates retail volatility.
  • Calibrated trade measures. If exports threaten domestic availability in deficit zones, use narrowly targeted, time-bound measures (e.g., export permits based on minimum domestic arrival thresholds) rather than blanket bans that spook markets.

Medium term (6–24 months)

  • Rapid expansion of cold chain beyond potatoes. Prioritise financing and plug-and-play cold hubs near production clusters for onions, tomatoes, mangoes and berries. Use viability gap funding and PPP models to diversify storage beyond current potato-centric capacity. Target: halve perishability rates for targeted crops within two seasons.
  • Boost processing and value-addition capacity. Invest in communal processing units (blanching, freezing, dehydration, canning) in high-yield districts so that surplus can be monetised rather than wasted. Incentivise private players with tax breaks and output-linked grants. Impact: creates demand floor and reduces seasonality in prices.
  • Strengthen Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs). Fast-track credit lines, aggregation grants and digital market linkages for FPOs to buy in bulk and negotiate better market terms — lowering transaction costs and dampening price swings.

Structural reforms (2–5 years)

  • Modernise market infrastructure and regulation. Accelerate reforms in physical and digital mandis (linkage to e-NAM, payment settlement timelines, grading and standardisation) and encourage private full-stack marketplaces that reduce middlemen friction.
  • Reduce post-harvest loss target from ~30% to <10%. Set a national target with state-level action plans: cold chains, improved packaging, rural roads, and training. Link budgetary support to measurable loss reduction.
  • Climate-resilient and storage-friendly crop research. Fund breeding for shelf-stable varieties, staggered maturity traits and regionspecific cultivars that reduce simultaneous arrivals.
  • De-risk value chains through insurance and forward contracts. Expand crop-insurance coverage tailored for perishable crops (index-plus claims tied to arrivals) and promote regulated futures/forwards contracts for onions and other key perishables with safeguards for smallholders.
  • Strategic price stabilisation and buffer mechanisms. Replace blunt procurement with nimble buffer mechanisms that combine small public buffers, incentivised private storage and an emergency price-stabilisation fund to intervene in genuine shortages without distorting markets permanently.

Governance and financing: how to pay for it

  • Reallocate a portion of existing agriculture budgets toward cold-chain capex and processing subsidies — these are investments, not recurring handouts.
  • Leverage multilateral and domestic green/climate finance for climate-proof storage and decentralised solar cold chains.
  • Use outcome-linked grants tied to loss-reduction and farmer income gains to ensure money buys results.

Political economy and consumer impact

Failure to act is costly. Food prices are politically explosive and disproportionately hurt the poor. The third advance estimates show the supply side is improving; the question now is whether policymakers will use this window to fix the market mechanics that have historically undone supply gains. If they do, households could see steadier vegetable and fruit prices and farmers could capture more value. If not, India will again witness the familiar spectacle of bumper harvests on paper and empty kitchen wallets in practice.

Bottom line

The 2024–25 horticulture estimates are a useful starting point. But higher tonnes are only meaningful when paired with smarter storage, faster processing, better aggregation, and markets designed to absorb — not amplify — shocks. Translate the numbers into systems change now, and the yield gains can finally lower prices and raise rural incomes. Delay, and the next inflation cycle will prove those tonnes were only statistical comfort.